Networking Conference Statistics

This page attempts to provide latest statistics for some of the major networking conferences.

For other networking conferences, see the Networking Conferences Statistics.

The statistics will be updated regularly. If you want to update the information, please contact yigechen01@gmail.com.

Conference

Conference	Website	Usual Submission Deadline	Usual Conference Date
ACM SIGCOMM	Link	January	August
USENIX NSDI	Link	March and September	February
ACM MobiCom	Link	August and February	October
ACM MobiSys	Link	December	June
ACM IMC	Link	May	October
ACM IPSN	Link	October	April
ACM SenSys	Link	April	November
IEEE INFOCOM	Link	July	April
ACM CoNEXT	Link	June	December
IEEE ICNP	Link	May	October

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	New Delhi, India	276	33	12.0%	1
2011	Toronto, Canada	223	32	14.3%	1
2012	Helsinki, Finland	235	31	13.2%	1
2013	Hong Kong, China	246	38	15.4%	1
2014	Chicago, IL, USA	242	45	18.6%	1
2015	London, UK	242	40	16.5%	1
2016	Florianópolis, Brazil	231	39	16.9%	1
2017	Los Angeles, CA, USA	250	36	14.4%	1
2018	Budapest, Hungary	220	40	18.2%	1
2019	Beijing, China	223	32	14.3%	1

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	San Jose, CA, USA	175	29	16.6%	1
2011	Boston, MA, USA	157	27	17.2%	1
2012	San Jose, CA, USA	169	30	17.8%	1
2013	Lombard, IL, USA	170	38	22.4%	1
2014	Seattle, WA, USA	223	38	17.0%	1
2015	Oakland, CA, USA	213	42	19.7%	1
2016	Santa Clara, CA, USA	225	45	20.0%	1
2017	Boston, MA, USA	254	46	18.1%	1
2018	Renton, WA, USA	255	40	15.7%	1
2019	Boston, MA, USA	92+240	19+30	14.8%	1
2020	Santa Clara, CA, USA	79+275	17+48	18.3%	1
2021	Boston, MA, USA

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	Chicago, IL, USA	233	33	14.2%	1
2011	Las Vegas, NV, USA	214	29	13.6%	1
2012	Istanbul, Turkey	212	32	15.1%	1
2013	Miami, FL, USA	207	28	13.5%	1
2014	Maui, HI, USA	220	36	16.4%	1
2015	Paris, France	207	38	18.4%	1
2016	New York, NY, USA	226	31	13.7%	1
2017	Snowbird Resort, UT, USA	186	35	18.8%	1
2018	New Delhi, India	187	42	22.4%	1
2019	Los Cabos, Mexico	290	55	19.0%	1

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	San Francisco, CA, USA	126	25	19.8%	1
2011	Washington, DC, USA	141	25	17.7%	1
2012	Low Wood Bay, Lake District, UK	182	32	17.6%	1
2013	Taipei, Taiwan, China	211	33	15.6%	1
2014	Bretton Woods, NH, USA	185	25	13.5%	1
2015	Florence, Italy	219	29	13.2%	1
2016	Singapore, Singapore	197	31	15.7%	1
2017	Niagara Falls, NY, USA	188	34	18.1%	1
2018	Munich, Germany	138	37	26.8%	1
2019	Seoul, South Korea	172	39	22.7%	1

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	Melbourne, Australia	110 (+101 short)	24 (+23 short)	21.8% (22.8% short)	1
2011	Berlin, Germany	111 (+110 short)	28 (+14 short)	25.2% (12.7% short)	1
2012	Boston, MA, USA	101 (+82 short)	35 (+10 short)	34.7% (12.2% short)	1
2013	Barcelona, Spain	92 (+86 short)	25 (+17 short)	27.2% (19.8% short)	1
2014	Vancouver, Canada	103 (+85 short)	32 (+11 short)	31.1% (12.9% short)	1
2015	Tokyo, Japan	96 (+73 short)	31 (+12 short)	32.3% (16.4% short)	1
2016	Santa Monica, CA, USA	104 (+80 short)	25 (+21 short)	24.0% (26.3% short)	1
2017	London, UK	100 (+79 short)	28 (+14 short)	28.0% (17.7% short)	1
2018	Boston, MA, USA	174	28 (+15 short)	24.7%	1
2019	Amsterdam, The Netherlands	118 (+79 short)	29(+10 short)	19.8%	1

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	Stockholm, Sweden	117(IP)+58(SPOTS)	20(IP)+11(SPOTS)	17.7%	1
2011	Chicago, IL, USA	87(IP)+35(SPOTS)	18(IP)+9(SPOTS)	22.1%	1
2012	Beijing, China	94(IP)+53(SPOTS)	12(IP)+10(SPOTS)	15.0%	1
2013	Philadelphia, PA, USA	115	14(IP)+10(SPOTS)	20.9%	1
2014	Berlin, Germany	111	23	20.7%	1
2015	Seattle, WA, USA	108	27	25.0%	1
2016	Vienna, Austria	117	21 (+2 short)	17.9% (+1.7% short)	1
2017	Pittsburgh, PA, USA	104	19	18.3%	1
2018	Porto, Portugal	82	22 (+3 short)	26.8% (+3.7% short)	1
2019	Montreal, Canada	97	25	25.8%	1
2020	Sydney, Australia

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	Zurich, Switzerland	145	25	17.2%	1
2011	Seattle, WA, USA	123	24	19.5%	1
2012	Toronto, Canada	123	23	18.7%	1
2013	Rome, Italy	123	21	17.1%	1
2014	Memphis, Tennessee	117	21	17.9%	1
2015	Seoul, South Korea	132	27	20.5%	1
2016	Stanford, CA, USA	119	21	17.6%	1
2017	Delft, The Netherlands	152	26	17.1%	1
2018	Shenzhen, China	147	23	15.6%	1
2019	New York, NY, USA	144	28	19.4%	1

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	San Diego, CA, USA	1575	276	17.5%	6
2011	Shanghai, China	1823	291	16.0%	6
2012	Orlando, FL, USA	1547	278	18.0%	6
2013	Turin, Italy	1613	280	17.4%	6
2014	Toronto, Canada	1650	319	19.3%	6
2015	Hong Kong, China	1640	316	19.3%	6
2016	San Francisco, CA, USA	1644	300	18.2%	6
2017	Atlanta, GA, USA	1395	292	20.9%	8
2018	Honolulu, HI, USA	1606	309	19.2%	8
2019	Paris, France	1464	288	19.7%	8
2020	Beijing, China	1354	268	19.8%

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	Philadelphia, PA, USA	147	28	19.0%	1
2011	Tokyo, Japan	159	30	18.9%	1
2012	Nice, France	176	31	17.6%	1
2013	Santa Barbara, CA, USA	143 (+83 short)	29 (+15 short)	20.3% (18.1% short)	1
2014	Sydney, Australia	133 (+54 short)	27 (+10 short)	20.3% (18.5% short)	1
2015	Heidelberg, Germany	136 (+60 short)	32 (+9 short)	23.5% (15.0% short)	1
2016	Irvine, CA, USA	160 (+39 short)	30 (+5 short)	18.8% (12.8% short)	1
2017	Seoul, South Korea	171 (+51 short)	31 (+8 short)	18.1% (15.7% short)	1
2018	Heraklion/Crete, Greece	142 (+43 short)	28 (+4 short)	19.7% (9.3% short)	1
2019	Orlando, FL, USA	140 (+41 short)	23 (+9 short)	15.4% (21.9 short)	1

Year	Venue	Submitted	Accepted	% Accepted	Tracks
2010	Kyoto, Japan	170	31	18.2%	1
2011	Vancouver, Canada	189	31	16.4%	1
2012	Austin, TX, USA	131	30	22.9%	1
2013	Göttingen, Germany	252	46	18.3%	1
2014	Raleigh, NC, USA	160	32	20.0%	1
2015	San Francisco, CA, USA	190	38	20.0%	1
2016	Singapore	229	46	20.1%	1
2017	Toronto, Canada	201	39	19.4%	1
2018	Cambridge, UK	196	35	17.9%	1
2019	Chicago, IL, USA	212	29 (+7 short)	13.7% (3.3% short)	1

Last updated: December 18, 2019